We've used GitLab before, and we like it as well. Might be a good way to go too.
Thanks, Cem Karan > -----Original Message----- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Rick Moen > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 6:29 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] The License Talking-About > List > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links > contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a > Web browser. > > > > > ---- > > [cross-post to license-review, snipped.] > > Quoting Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) (cem.f.karan....@mail.mil): > > > What about GitHub? > > Using a proprietary hosting platform for outsourced tracking of open-source > licenses? Could work, but that risks punishment by the Gods > of Irony. > > > BTW, at $WORK, we found the open-source workalike platform GitLab to our > liking. Caution-https://about.gitlab.com/ > > -- > Cheers, "An idealist is one who, on noticing that a > rose > Rick Moen smells better than a cabbage, concludes that > it > r...@linuxmafia.com makes a better soup." > McQ! (4x80) -- H.L. Mencken, _A Book of > Burlesque_ > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss