Hello all,

I did a quick review of the recent list traffic and did not find any mention of the OpenSSL license change:

https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/22/license/

In short, the appear to be attempting a clean-up of their license which currently is largely permissive but includes an advertising clause.

The proposed solution to any and all current issues, real or perceived, is a move to the Apache license.

Speaking from a BSD community perspective, this is not necessarily progress. If the advertising clause is truly the issue, that can be fixed just as the University of California, Berkeley demonstrated with their infamous clause that they resolved with a blanket permission to remove the clause:

ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change

If a specific definition of "business friendliness" is desired by their constituents that they believe will be solved by the patent clause of the Apache license, a supplemental patent clause can be added, as Facebook has demonstrated with their recent Zstandard compression library:

Zstandard - Fast real-time compression algorithm http://www.zstd.net
https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/LICENSE
https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/PATENTS

For the more philosophical, the move also marks a move from copyright law to contract law which could bring complications for some consumers.

Finally, the OpenSSL/Linux Foundation team are insisting that silence from contributors can be equated with their full agreement with the move. The legality of this assertion as been questioned, albeit by non-lawyers.

"If we do not hear from you, we will assume that you have no objection."

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=149028593819547&w=2

I for one am hoping to get the three main BSD Foundations to make a statement on this and I welcome your input. I will be first to say that I am not a lawyer and am at the mercy of experts.

I *can* however say with confidence that "we're changing the license of the software you are working on and are hoping you will not notice nor respond" (Notably regarding LibreSSL, the fork developed by OpenBSD) is not welcome by any software community.

All the best,

Michael Dexter
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to