On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:41:41 +0200, Erik Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Should the Qt4 port use ifdefs so it can be used with Qt3 as well, or
should
we take the opportunity and rewrite parts of the gui that's showing its
age
and go for Qt4 only? Rewriting and keeping Qt3 is of course also
possible,
but IMHO that would require extra work that is better put elsewhere.
I'm leaning towards Qt4 only, but I'd like to here what the rest of you
think.
First of all, I would like to hear your thoughts... :-)
What is the main goal or purpose in moving to qt4? Just to be "up-to-date"
with others? Or, may be, moving will let us do some things properly or
easily. More technical information and/or specification is needed here to
decide anything.
As for branches...
Yes, I agree, two separate sources is an overkill. But leaving qt3 version
alive is a must, at least until all major distros (including Slack,
Debian, RH-derivatives, SuSe) contain qt4 and claim it 'stable'. Which is
not the case with Slack for example. So at the moment my vote goes for
ifdefs.
--
Eugene Paskevich | *==)----------- | Plug me into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -----------(==* | The Matrix
