On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Daniel Gl�ckner wrote: > > also, if the icq2001b client initiates the connection, licq gets the > > message but still cant send anything back over the connection. at least > > that part worked with licq-1.0.3.
> No, it didn't. 1.0.3's behaviour was exactly the same. Dirk posted > something about a fix on Nov 14th. I'm not shure, but I think he > simply disabled CPacketTcp::PostBuffer_v6. The latest CVS version no > longer contains that patch. Maybe he only fixed it in HEAD and not in > V8_BRANCH. Probably - when I said "it worked with 1.0.3" I meant "it worked with 1.0.3 with that patch", because that patch fixed it. So we should perhaps get a similar fix to the current head.. > > the same happens to incoming messages, some are magically lost (but > > that seems to happen mostly from icq99b users..) > ICQ 99b uses the same > UDP protocol licq-1.0.3 used, so it's not licq's "fault". Is it a good idea to tell ICQ99b users to upgrade then ? I mean, if messages are lost between a 99b client and licq, then it's the 99b clients fault ? /BW _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
