Hi all, Continuing the work of rewriting the old CBuffer I have created CTlvBuffer to implement TLV functions. It uses the new CBuffer internally. I think it is a complete replacement for the old class, but please take a look and tell me what you think.[1] It's proably a bit rough at the edges...
Also at [1] is an updated CBuffer and some unit tests. For reference:[2] TLV - Type Length Value. A tuple allowing typed opaque information to be passed through the protocol. Typically TLV's are intended for interpretation at the core layer. Being typed, new elements can be added w/o modifying the lower layers. A question about coding style and acronyms: Should TLV be written as TLV or follow normal naming rules (TlvClass, tlvFunction)? I opted for the second option since I think that the advantage of never having to stop and think if an author consider, for example TLV, to be an acronym or not outweights any advantages the first option has. (The only one I can think of is that TLV looks better than Tlv.) But what do you think? // Erik [1] - http://svn.ejohansson.se/viewvc/src/misc/licq/ [2] - http://www.aim.aol.com/javadev/terminology.html -- The only stupid question is the unasked one. Erik Johansson http://ejohansson.se ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
