Guy,
Im just trying to write a small and very situation specific extension
to lift rules. Whilst it is specific, its very reusable for me and one
of the things id like to do is extend RulesSeq[T].
This way, I my lift apps I can have a DSL just like the other lift
conventions:
MyThirdPartyRules.someAspect.prepend {
case ... => ...
}
Now, in order to actually process the supplied PF's in
MyThirdPartyRules, the scope of:
private[http] def toList = rules
will need to be relaxed... Any objections to this? Or reasons why this
would be catastrophically bad?
Cheers, Tim
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
