My apologies. I should have cleaned out my local Maven repo before building the demo app. I'll fix that in source and push a new version. Also, you're correct that it should probably be labeled as a demo archetype rather than a basic archetype. In the interest of making it useful for everyone I'll solicit input on exactly what people would want to see in a JPA basic archetype.
Derek On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Alex <a...@liivid.com> wrote: > > The good news is I'm learning some things about maven and scalajpa is > so far easy to set up. > > The bad news is lift-archetype-jpa-basic references scalajpa which is > not on the main maven servers (at least where it's trying to find it). > > I added > > <repositories> > <repository> > <id>scala-tools</id> > <url>http://scala-tools.org/repo-snapshots</url> > </repository> > </repositories> > > and changed the version for scalajpa to 1.1-SNAPSHOT > > in web/pom.xml . > > Everything worked as advertised after that. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
