committed.

On Apr 3, 8:10 pm, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well I just assigned it to myself ... Dave if youreally want it just
> let me know to stay away ... I should be commititng the fix either
> today or tomorrow.
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Apr 3, 7:12 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please add this to 
> > Lighthousehttp://liftweb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/26102-lift/overview Feel
> >  free to
> > assign it to me.
>
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, nau <anem...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi there,
>
> > > There is a bug in ScriptRenderer.scala I've described here:
>
> > >http://liftweb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/26102/tickets/31-bug-liftaj...
> > > .
>
> > > I've got a quick fix for it but I don't think it's the best one
> > > (sorry, can't provide normal patch now, I'm on windows):
>
> > > ScriptRenderer.scala
>
> > > function addPageName(url) {
> > >  return url.replace('""" + LiftRules.ajaxPath + """', '""" +
> > > LiftRules.ajaxPath + liftPage + """);
> > > }
>
> > > function lift_actualAjaxCall(data, onSuccess, onFailure) {
> > > """ +
> > >                        LiftRules.jsArtifacts.ajax(AjaxInfo(JE.JsRaw
> > > ("data"),
> > >                                                            "POST",
>
> > > LiftRules.ajaxPostTimeout,
> > >                                                            false,
> > > "script",
> > >                                                            Full
> > > ("onSuccess"), Full("onFailure")))+
> > >                        """
> > > }
>
> > > """ +
> > >                        LiftRules.jsArtifacts.onLoad(new JsCmd() {def
> > > toJsCmd = "lift_doAjaxCycle()"}).toJsCmd)
>
> > >  val liftPage = if (LiftRules.enableLiftGC) "/'+lift_page" else
> > > ""
>
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > One more. I've found inconsistent statements in Liftweb book (pdf
> > > compilation master-20090309 from github). I'm not sure wheather it
> > > still exists but anyway:
> > > paragraph 3.4 states:
> > > "3. Check to see if the request should be handled by a View. This is
> > > covered in section
> > > 3.6
> > > 4. If the request is not handled by a View, find a template that
> > > matches and use it. We’ll
> > > cover templates in section 3.5"
>
> > > but paragraph 3.6 states:
>
> > > "In either case, View lookup and dispatch is done after template
> > > resolution, so templates take priority."
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > Alex Nemish
>
> > --
> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to