Thus suggesting our motto:

Scala/Lift: Our heads are in the stars, but our feet are firmly planted 
in the, er, "soil."

Chas.

David Pollak wrote:
> And of course Beginning Scala is BS :-)
> 
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Meredith Gregory 
> <lgreg.mered...@gmail.com <mailto:lgreg.mered...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Jorge,
> 
>     i was going to express a similar sentiment. There are lots of
>     available options.
> 
>         * PinS
>         * PrinS
>         * PrinSc
> 
>     Best wishes,
> 
>     --greg
> 
> 
>     On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:jorge.or...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Aside: I think the preferred abbreviation for Programming in
>         Scala is PinS, not PiS.
> 
>         Just fyi,
> 
>         --j
> 
> 
>         On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Timothy Perrett
>         <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>             My advice, if your generally / vaugly familiar with Scala
>             from reading PiS
>             (that truly is a very unfortunate acronym!) just dive into
>             making a lift
>             app, then go from there.
> 
>             One of the best things about Lift is the community - if you
>             have questions,
>             chances are its either already in the group archive from one
>             of our many
>             debates, or in the lift book, or if not, just ask on the
>             mailing list and
>             someone will no doubt help you right quick!
> 
>             Good luck!
> 
>             Tim
> 
> 
>             On 03/04/2009 23:01, "Charles F. Munat" <c...@munat.com
>             <mailto:c...@munat.com>> wrote:
> 
>              >
>              > I'd suggest that you start working in Lift, then when you
>             encounter
>              > something that doesn't make sense to you, refer to the
>             PiS book
>              > (unfortunate acronym). It helps if you have the PDF
>             version because you
>              > can search. The index is OK, but often insufficient.
>              >
>              > This is the approach I used to get started, though
>             eventually I went
>              > back and read most of the book sequentially (I still have
>             a couple of
>              > chapters to go). Take a look also at DPP's book and the
>             online Lift
>              > book, both easily searchable.
>              >
>              > If you want to jump ahead in the book, I'd recommend the
>             following:
>              >
>              > 15: Case Classes and Pattern Matching
>              > 16: Working with Lists
>              > 23: For Expressions Revisited
>              >
>              > Lists, for expressions, case classes, and pattern
>             matching are used *all
>              > over the place* in Lift. You can't be too familiar with
>             these.
>              >
>              > Then maybe:
>              >
>              > 19: Type Parameterization
>              > 21: Implicit Conversions and Parameters
>              >
>              > You don't need to understand those thoroughly, but having
>             some
>              > familiarity with them will help with debugging and
>             understanding what
>              > the heck is going on.
>              >
>              > If you have time, you could also read the following to
>             fill in a few gaps:
>              >
>              > 22: Implementing Lists
>              > 26: Working with XML
>              >
>              > And if you're going to use Comet, you should probably read:
>              >
>              > 30: Actors and Concurrency
>              >
>              > But again, you can dive in and then reference these
>             chapters as necessary.
>              >
>              > Chas.
>              >
>              > lmorroni wrote:
>              >> Hi,
>              >> I am a Java programmer that is interested in learning
>             Lift.  I have
>              >> just finished the first six chapters of Programming in
>             Scala.  I
>              >> wonder what people's opinions are on how much of this
>             book I need to
>              >> read before diving into Lift.  I attempted to dive into
>             Lift without
>              >> reading anything on Scala and that worked great until I
>             wanted to
>              >> start reviewing the Lift libraries :)
>              >> Maybe there are some chapters in this book that I can
>             skip?  I think
>              >> the book is really well written and I have followed
>             everything so
>              >> far.  I just would rather get rolling on Lift sooner
>             rather than
>              >> later.
>              >> Larry
>              >>
>              >>>
>              >
>              > >
>              >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     L.G. Meredith
>     Managing Partner
>     Biosimilarity LLC
>     1219 83rd St NW
>     Seattle, WA 98117
> 
>     +1 206.650.3740
> 
>     http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
> 
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to