It does, but in the lift-widgets module. I think that the functionality is sufficiently "enhanced" that it should stay a separate widget as opposed to becoming the default behavior.
Derek On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM, DavidV <david.v.villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, it would be great it Lift1.1 included all of the > necessary .js, .css and class files for the new MenuWidget > > On Apr 3, 3:42 am, "Charles F. Munat" <c...@munat.com> wrote: > > Have you looked at Windmill? > > > > http://www.getwindmill.com/ > > > > From what I've heard it's pretty cool. > > > > Chas. > > > > David Pollak wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Bill Venners <b...@artima.com > > > <mailto:b...@artima.com>> wrote: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David Pollak > > > <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > > > <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Bill Venners <b...@artima.com > > > <mailto:b...@artima.com>> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi David, > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, David Pollak > > > >> <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > > > <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >> > Folks, > > > > > >> > Improved testing framework and better testing support when > > > running in > > > >> > "test" > > > >> > mode. > > > > > >> Can you elaborate on what your plans are for this? > > > > > > It's a goal, not a set of plans. I'm expecting one of the > > > committers would > > > > take ownership and figure it out. Wanna be a committer, take > > > ownership, and > > > > figure it out? > > > > > Ooh, I stepped in that one. > > > > > Yeah... don't you know the rule... get a good idea and you own it. I'm > > > just the Tom Sawyer who's convincing the smart folks to white-wash my > > > fence/build Lift. ;-) > > > > > The testing Lift apps is a good, real use > > > case for both ScalaTest and Specs. I hope to meet with Eric > Torreborre > > > Monday. I'll talk with him about what's needed for Lift, as I think > > > he's more familiar with its testing needs. I have definitely wanted > to > > > do some work with Lift so I can become more familiar with it as a > web > > > app framework, but just haven't had time yet. I'm gradually popping > > > things off my stack of tasks, so I'll get there eventually. > > > > > Cool. I think there's a need for a better way to test web apps in > > > general and to describe the state models so that they can be tested in > a > > > sane way. I just don't have a clue as to how to do it. But... I think > > > it ties in with the JavaScript enhancements I want to see in 1.1. > > > Perhaps there's some sort of state/logic combinator thingy that can > > > emit client-side JS, sync data, and be very testable. Dunno... just > > > ranting/flailing. > > > > > Bill > > > > > >> Thanks. > > > > > >> Bill > > > > > > -- > > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp > > > > > -- > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
