True, very true. I know DPP is generally against caching, but we all recognise the need to caching in a production environment. Perhaps, rather than asking if we should re-invent the wheel with a specific cache mech within lift, perhaps my quesiton is this:
Is LRU and the KeyedCache abstraction sufficient for people to implement all our caching requirements within lift? You mentioned TemplateCache not being thread safe... Is there away we can provide some thread safe abstraction for users caching perhaps... Just rambling here :) Cheers, Tim > And to answer your previous question, about generic caching, I'd say > not necessarily. I'm working on templates caching but I'm not sure if > we should turn this into a generic caching mechanism. Maybe we can > talk more on your localization caching idea and see how it goes. I > wouldn't put a generic caching mechanism in lift .. but of course this > is not really my call. There are plenty generic caching mechanisms out > there and having lift to do that would probably be a too big > burden. ... it's just my personal view. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
