What do you mean by overhead? :) .. amount of data? ... just try to
minimize it as much as you can :)

On Apr 6, 3:27 pm, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> Hey Viktor :)
>
> What¹s the overhead associated with this? Little? Much?
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On 06/04/2009 13:17, "Viktor Klang" <viktor.kl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If the config is on a per-session basis, then SessionVar should be the way 
> > to
> > go.
> > But of course, put it in _one_ SessionVar, and not hundreds... :)
>
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tim Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
>
> >> Guys,
>
> >> Im working on a system where by there is a bunch of configuration
> >> options that should exist for a given application, and are application
> >> wide... Im handling this right now in a similar way to LiftRules.
>
> >> However, I also have some configuration that can be done on a per
> >> user / per session basis - what is the recommended strategy for
> >> handling this without simply abusing the crap out of SessionVar?
>
> >> Cheers, Tim
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to