When I want to have user defined types, I have to write them as a Hibernate hack to JPA - Id rather not be wedded to Hibernate.When I get a collection out of a returned entity, I have to use JCL to wrap it. I'd rather, have everything in Scala collections. When I have a read only entity, I'd like it to be immutable. In fact, maybe all entities should be, but thats probably too hard. I'm just taking about the lower layer of JPA that Derek's stuff hooks into - its OK for Java, it kind of sucks for Scala.
Just my thoughts, don't expect anyone to agree. cheers Oliver On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote: > > Lol! Sorry oliver... I remember now :) > > What did you have in mind for “scala solution using JPA”? Is this not what > we have already? > > Cheers, Tim > > > On 23/05/2009 12:33, "Oliver Lambert" <olambo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I helped with the code! > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> > wrote: > > > > To what degree are you wanting to re-invent the wheel? Derek has done > amazing work with JPA and Scala - the resulting output being scala-jpa and > the jpa archetypes for lift. Are you familiar with them? > > Cheers, Tim > > On 23/05/2009 11:56, "Oliver Lambert" <olambo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > JPA is a ORM tool. I think it would be great if someone would create a > > Scala solution using JPA as the starting point - any takers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
