I'd vote for closures. We use annotations for JPA because we have to, but
IMHO closures provide a nicer semantic approach because they syntactically
enclose the block where the action is occurring.
Derek
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jonas Bonér <jbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No perf difference. The annotations are turned into the same exact
> closures.
>
> 2009/5/29 Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>:
> >
> >
> > Are there any performance implications considering closures vs
> annotations?
> > Agreed that closures are more "lift like" however.
> >
> > Cheers, Tim
> >
> > On 29/05/2009 10:21, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I think that would be really good. But I'd rather not use annotations.
> >> Personally I find closures approach a much better fit here.
> >>
> >> withTxRequired {
> >> ... // do transational stuff
> >>
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Br's,
> >> Marius
> >>
> >> On May 29, 11:55 am, Jonas Bonér <jbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi guys.
> >>>
> >>> I have been talking with David Pollak the rest of the lift team about
> >>> adding JTA to Lift. I have implemented that for a product written in
> >>> Scala some time ago. Now some of that code is OSS
> >>> at:http://github.com/jboner/skalman/tree
> >>>
> >>> We used using two different APIs.
> >>> 1. Annotations (would require Lift to support proxied objects, e.g.
> >>> grab them from a factory):
> >>>
> >>> @TransactionAttribute(REQUIRED)
> >>> def transactionalMethod = { ... }
> >>>
> >>> 2. Call-by-name:
> >>>
> >>> withTxRequired {
> >>> ... // do transational stuff
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> But I don't know what fits Lift and would like to know how you guys
> >>> would like to have JTA integrated.
> >>> At which level? Which APIs? Etc.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jonas Bonér
> >>>
> >>> twitter: @jboner
> >>> blog: http://jonasboner.com
> >>> work: http://crisp.se
> >>> work: http://scalablesolutions.se
> >>> code: http://github.com/jboner
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonas Bonér
>
> twitter: @jboner
> blog: http://jonasboner.com
> work: http://crisp.se
> work: http://scalablesolutions.se
> code: http://github.com/jboner
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
