+1 As an evolving framework, it definitely makes more sense to favour consistency over backward compatibility at this stage
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:00 AM, marius d. <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Other folks, please speak up ! :) ... I will soon migrate this into a > Lift widget. > > > Br's, > Marius > > On Jun 6, 4:53 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think I'm using in one place in one project so my api breakage factor > is > > low. I'm okay with moving it unless someone else is going to feel real > > pain. > > > > On Jun 6, 2009 12:24 AM, "Marius" <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is there a reason why the JQuery autocomplete is not a Lift widget but > > instead it lives in http/jquery package? .. I remember a long time ago > > me putting it in the jquery package to separate SHtml stuff that is > > dependent on JQuery to the others. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Br', > > Marius > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
