Of the same prefix, that is... ------------------------------------- Naftoli Gugenheim<naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Which means that chaining binds is only useful when they operate on nodes that are side by side or are order outer first... Thanks. ------------------------------------- David Pollak<feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Is this according to the specs? Yes. <a:x> fails binding and by default, it is returned. There is no nesting or recursion in the seeking of the nested elements. > > bind("x", <x:a><x:b /></x:a>, "b" -> "c") > just returns the original NodeSeq untransformed. > > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---