Yes we tried to deprecate it but later on we un-derprecate it :) So you can use <lift:with-param> safely. Purely for naming perspective <lift:insert> seems to me more intuitive than <lift:with-param> ... I'm not sure if this is a strong enough motivation to change the name hence inducing a breaking change.
Br's, Marius On Aug 19, 10:55 am, inca <incarn...@whiteants.net> wrote: > As suggested > inhttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/d664b712d... > by Mr. Marius D., I should use lift:with-param in order to insert > content into multiple bind points of template. But recently I read > that this tag is deprecated. What alternatives are available? > P.S. I would propose <lift:insert at="bindPointName"> tag for this > purpose. And the contents of <lift:bind name="bindPointName"> tag > should be assumed as default if none <lift:insert ...> tag overrides > it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
