Absolutely, and just limit to that, no more. /Indrajit
On Sep 14, 11:22 pm, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com> wrote: > For me, annotations in Scala are permissible when having to deal with Java > frameworks that need annotations to work. > (examples: JAX-RS, JPA et al) > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Timothy Perrett > <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Whilst I cant speak for anyone else - looking at Java these days > > generally makes me want to be sick and annotations are simply > > convulsion inducing ;-) > > > There are some issues from a technical perspective with Scala > > annotations (like deep nested annotations for JPA), but otherwise, in > > terms of lift i think there are not really any good technical reasons > > why it is we dont use java annotations - its mainly a general > > dislike. > > > Cheers, Tim > > > On Sep 14, 6:34 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can someone detail the minus side of annotations? (Other than "it's just > > not the Scala/Lift way." :) Preferably in terms of what goal it inhibits.) > > > > Also keep in mind that the "exception" in terms of the code being in a > > Java source file is a temporary workaround that will be replaced when it's > > possible, so it's not a huge exception. > > -- > Viktor Klang > > Blog: klangism.blogspot.com > Twttr: viktorklang > > Lift Committer - liftweb.com > AKKA Committer - akkasource.org > Cassidy - github.com/viktorklang/Cassidy.git > SoftPub founder:http://groups.google.com/group/softpub --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
