Whilst I agree there is certainly a lot very good work in spring security, one has to ask: what is it YOU want from it? You listed a bunch of features there but one would imagine your not going to be using them all.
Perhaps look at this another way - what problem do you have that you feel spring security addresses that is not currently addressed by lift? (that is, im not saying Lift is perfect just trying to drill into your requirements) Cheers, Tim On Sep 15, 7:38 pm, "Charles F. Munat" <c...@munat.com> wrote: > Pretty much drop-in capability, integration with CAS or JOSSO for > single-sign-on, easy integration of OpenID, easy integration with > OpenLDAP, documentation (for the next developer), six years of debugging > and tweaking, and not reinventing the wheel, for a start... > > Chas. > > > > David Pollak wrote: > > What does Spring security give you that you can't get with SiteMap for > > HTML pages and guards or wrappers around partial functions for non-HTML? > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Charles F. Munat <c...@munat.com > > <mailto:c...@munat.com>> wrote: > > > Has anyone tried using Spring Security (formerly Acegi) in Lift? > > > If so, care to comment on the experience? Suggestions? Pitfalls? > > > Thanks! > > > Chas. > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
