I think that's reasonable, as long as the key for that field is well-chosen to avoid potential conflicts. When I worked with Marco Behler on ScaJorp I think that we found a de facto standard name of "jsonClass".
Derek On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > wrote: > Folks, > What are thoughts on including (perhaps optionally) the name of the case > class in an additional JSON field so that one can reconstruct a list that > contains many different types? > > Thanks, > > David > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
