FWIW - I went with choice #1. Seems like CometActor name method doesn't really get the value of the name parameter in the XML :( Appended uniqueId on all the variables and functions - worked just fine!
On Oct 15, 12:56 pm, Java1Guy <mark.cha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all! > I have had some great success in putting together a web page using > Flot for client-side JavaScript charting. I *even* generate said > JavaScript in my Scala code (well, the data and the call to the > appropriate function) - FTW! > > Now my question is this: I need multiple graphs on a given page. > Should I repeat the CometActor tag, or will the actor properly handle > multiple tags in the snippet? > (The 'theScript' tag is where the javascript is pasted, a couple > variable defns and a function call.) > > Current one graph code: > <lift:surround with="default" at="content"> > <lift:comet type="FlotkitActor" name="main"> > <f:theScript gt="Recent.Production" cid="placeholder"/> > <div id="placeholder" style="width:600px;height:300px;">Graph > will load in ~ 10 sec.</div> > </lift:comet> > </lift:surround> > > Choice 1 - multiple actors: > <lift:comet type="FlotkitActor" name="main1"> > <f:theScript gt="Recent.Production" cid="placeholder1"/> > <div id="placeholder1" style="width:600px;height:300px;">Graph > will load in ~ 10 sec.</div> > </lift:comet> > <lift:comet type="FlotkitActor" name="main2"> > <f:theScript gt="Recent.Demand" cid="placeholder2"/> > <div id="placeholder2" style="width:600px;height:300px;">Graph > will load in ~ 10 sec.</div> > </lift:comet> > > Choice 2 - one actor, multiple tags: > <lift:comet type="FlotkitActor" name="main"> > <f:theScript gt="Recent.Production" cid="placeholder2"/> > <div id="placeholder1" style="width:600px;height:300px;">Graph > will load in ~ 10 sec.</div> > <f:theScript gt="Recent.Demand" cid="placeholder2"/> > <div id="placeholder2" style="width:600px;height:300px;">Graph > will load in ~ 10 sec.</div> > </lift:comet> > > Would it depend on whether the actors need to update independently? > (not sure if they do or not, yet) > I'm guessing opt. #1 unless there's serious magic in the bind > method... (which could happen) > > Thanks, > Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
