Right. Fortunately most of the work setting up Joda Time will make switching to Scala Time pretty simple.
Derek On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote: > > I thought we had this discussion in some other thread and because > scala-time wasn't 1.0 there was a general reluctancy to use it? We > could cherry pick some of the code however; im sure Jorge wouldn't > mind :-) > > Cheers, Tim > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 11:30, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > > > > You have looked at Scala Time, right? I think some of this may already > > be implemented there, and it would probably be better to extend that > > rather than reinvent it. But maybe I'm thinking about something else? > > > > http://github.com/jorgeortiz85/scala-time > > > > Chas. > > > > Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > >> Oh, I plan on incorporating the DSL. My thought was that JodaHelpers > >> would define most of the same methods as TimeHelpers, just > >> operating on > >> DateTime instead of Date and Calendar. Then you could do > >> > >> import ...Helpers._ > >> import ...JodaHelpers._ > >> > >> and the latter import would mask the TimeHelpers methods. Or you > >> could > >> just import JodaHelpers by itself. Actually, Joda Time has some very > >> nice facilities for doing intervals that would simplify the DSLs a > >> lot > >> and possibly make it richer. > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, David Pollak > >> <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> I personally like the DSLs that TimeHelpers provides. I'd hate to > >> see it deprecated or go away without the ability to write 30 > >> seconds > >> later using some other DSL. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > >> <dchenbec...@gmail.com <mailto:dchenbec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Well, actually, maybe I'll just make a JodaHelpers with the > >> applicable methods on it and we can just deprecate the entire > >> TimeHelpers object. If anyone else has a better idea I'm all > >> ears. > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > >> <dchenbec...@gmail.com <mailto:dchenbec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> OK, will do. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, David Pollak > >> <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> I'd prefer not the break the apis without deprecating > >> them first > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Derek Chen-Becker > >> <dchenbec...@gmail.com <mailto:dchenbec...@gmail.com>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Just asking, since I'm looking at bolting a lot of > >> java.util.Date methods onto the innards of > >> TimeHelpers so that the specs pass. > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lift, the simply functional web framework > http://liftweb.net > >> Beginning Scala > http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > >> Surf the harmonics > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > >> Surf the harmonics > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
