On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim <naftoli...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I think there is support somewhere in the MappedField hierarchy for a
> MappedField that represents to database columns. Take a look at
> MappedPassword.
>

Having a field represent two columns (as MappedPassword does) is a huge
piece of pain.  I've made a ton of mistakes with Mapper, but the biggest,
nastiest shining hairball of a mistake was compound columns.  Have I scared
anyone off using them yet?


>
>
> -------------------------------------
> harryh<har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Make MyMappedTimeSpan a trait:
>
> trait MyMappedTimeSpan[T <:Mapper[T]](val owner: T) {
>  object from extends MappedTime[MapperType](this.asIntanceOf
> [MatterType])
>  object to extends MappedTime[MapperType](this.asIntanceOf
> [MatterType])
> }
>
> And then use it like so:
>
> class DBObject extends LongKeyedMapper[Bericht] with IdPK with
> MyMappedTimeSpan[DBObject] {
> }
>
> -harryh
>
> On Oct 16, 8:08 am, hyperion <hyperion1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried this:
> >
> > class MyMappedTimeSpan[T <:Mapper[T]](val owner: T){
> >     import net.liftweb.util._
> >     import net.liftweb.http.S
> >     import xml.NodeSeq
> >
> >     val from = new MappedTime(owner)
> >     val to = new MappedTime(owner)
> >  }
> >
> > class DBObject extends LongKeyedMapper[Bericht] with IdPK {
> >
> >   def getSingleton = Bericht
> >   ...
> >   object test extends MyMappedTimeSpan(this)
> >
> > }
> >
> > and bound this class with:
> > "from" -> bt.test.from.toForm,
> > "to" -> bt.test.to.toForm,
> >
> > In html:
> >                 <tr>
> >                         <td><bt:von/></td>
> >                         <td><bt:nach/></td>
> >                 </tr>
> >
> > Everything worked fine... except that my timespan is completely
> > ignored in the database ;). I think the reason is you use reflection
> > on class DBObject to find all values that should be stored in the
> > dabase?... but I have not inspected the source code jet... I am new to
> > lift and also to scala....
> >
> > My Question: Is it possible to build such Datatypes based on two or
> > more  DB-Fields of the single table...?... I think even they are
> > mapped to the "master"-DB-table, such types could be helpful...
> >
> > Greetz
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to