I doubt I can find one, but it still feels awkward having to type the name of the class so many times. Another option could be to use some shared object to do this stuff, but I guess it wouldn't be as neat to use it then.
- Vesa On 2 marras, 18:33, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Vesa <brut...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It seems like boilerplate that every mapped class needs to define a > > getSingleton method returning companion object. Can't there be any > > default with this and is there any way to get rid of the manually > > defined companion object if user isn't going to define any new methods > > on it, while still having the default meta functionality? > > I know of no mechanism in Scala to discover companion objects. If you find > one (that's not simply Java Reflection), please let me know. > > > > > - Vesa > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
