Agreed. Its annoying, but right now I think we are probably stuck with
it.

Cheers, Tim

On Dec 20, 9:06 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri <indraj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/12/09 2:18 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> > I don't think it's worth a lot of effort.   If it's been tried and
> > doesn't work nicely, I'm fine with sticking with the current structure.
>
> > At some point, though, you have to decide who's boss, you or the build
> > system ;)
>
> > (I love taking jabs at Maven, sorry)
>
> So do I, no worries. Ironically, Maven is still getting away with all these!
>
> - IRC
>
>
>
>
>
> > alex
>
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> > <indraj...@gmail.com <mailto:indraj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >     Alex,
>
> >     Yes, it's possible to have artifactId ≠ directoryName for Maven
> >     projects. But last time I did this Maven chose to be very cruel with me
> >     (site generation, relative path resolutions etc. broke).
>
> >     Also see the point and convergence to decision here:
> >    http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/msg/73a5652a55076384
>
> >     In this case, I would usually type out "cd liftcore" blindly and the
> >     right thing would happen automatically thanks to "shopt -s cdspell" in
> >     my .bashrc config. But I digress.
>
> >     However, I won't mind re-opening this discussion on 'lift-' prefix if
> >     you want me to.
>
> >     Cheers, Indrajit
>
> >     On 21/12/09 1:29 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> >      > While we're discussing lift-core in a separate thread, I wanted
> >     to bring
> >      > up a minor annoyance....
>
> >      > All module directories in the repository start with "lift-",
>
> >      > boisv...@smudge:~/git/liftweb$ tree -L 2 | grep lift
> >      > |-- lift-archetypes
> >      > |   |-- lift-archetype-basic
> >      > |   |-- lift-archetype-blank
> >      > |   |-- lift-archetype-jpa-basic
> >      > |   |-- lift-archetype-jpa-blank
> >      > |   |-- lift-archetype-jpa-blank-single
> >      > |-- lift-base
> >      > |   |-- lift-actor
> >      > |   |-- lift-common
> >      > |   |-- lift-json
> >      > |   |-- lift-util
> >      > |   |-- lift-webkit
> >      > |-- lift-core
> >      > |-- lift-examples
> >      > |   |-- hellolift
> >      > |-- lift-misc
> >      > |   |-- lift-installer
> >      > |-- lift-modules
> >      > |   |-- lift-amqp
> >      > |   |-- lift-facebook
> >      > |   |-- lift-jta
> >      > |   |-- lift-machine
> >      > |   |-- lift-oauth
> >      > |   |-- lift-openid
> >      > |   |-- lift-osgi
> >      > |   |-- lift-paypal
> >      > |   |-- lift-testkit
> >      > |   |-- lift-textile
> >      > |   |-- lift-widgets
> >      > |   |-- lift-wizard
> >      > |   |-- lift-xmpp
> >      > |-- lift-persistence
> >      > |   |-- lift-jpa
> >      > |   |-- lift-mapper
> >      > |   |-- lift-record
>
> >      > This naming isn't very practical when navigating the directory
> >     structure
> >      > since it meddles with completion.
>
> >      > e.g.  cd <TAB> (beep!) lift- <TAB> (beep!) c <TAB> (finally completes
> >      > "core")
>
> >      > Does Maven support simpler names?  Could we have something like this?
>
> >      > |-- base
> >      > |   |-- actor
> >      > |   |-- common
> >      > |   |-- json
> >      > |   |-- util
> >      > |   |-- webkit
> >      > |-- modules
> >      > |   |-- amqp
> >      > |   |-- ...
> >      > |   |-- ...
>
> >      > (I'm not suggesting change the names of the modules;  just the
> >     names of
> >      > the directories)
>
> >      > alex
>
> >      > --
>
> >      > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >      > Groups "Lift" group.
> >      > To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
> >     <mailto:liftweb@googlegroups.com>.
> >      > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >      > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >     <mailto:liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> >      > For more options, visit this group at
> >      >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> >     --
>
> >     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >     Groups "Lift" group.
> >     To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
> >     <mailto:liftweb@googlegroups.com>.
> >     To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >     liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >     <mailto:liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> >     For more options, visit this group at
> >    http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to