Can the deprecration message be made to say so? ------------------------------------- Ross Mellgren<dri...@gmail.com> wrote:
Instead of LiftRules.rewrite, use LiftRules.statelessRewrite if you want the old behavior (e.g. rewriting while S is not available) If you have rewrites that require S to be available, then you can use the new LiftRules.statefulRewrite I'm not sure about the SiteMap question. -Ross On Dec 31, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Alex Black wrote: > Two questions: > > 1. Whats the replacement for LiftRules.rewrite? > 2. Is there a way I can write a custom Loc so that SiteMap is aware of > the re-writing? > > I'm following the AccountLoc extends Loc[AccountInfo] example in the > book, but my rewriting is not having any effect yet, I am trying to > figure out what I am missing. > > - Alex > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
