I saw this on http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxFaq
For which general use cases is Nginx more appropriate than Squid? (And vice > versa...) > > Nginx is generally deployed as a reverse proxy, not as a caching proxy > (like Squid). The key advantage with Nginx is its nominal RAM and CPU usage > under heavy load. Squid is best applied to cache dynamic content for > applications that cannot do it themselves. > > The proxy module <http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpProxyModule> offers > configurations for caching upstream servers. > Does that at all imply that it could be beneficial to use Squid instead of Nginx with Lift?--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
