Sure, I will. This would go in as regular 280_port_refresh update activity.
Cheers, Indrajit
On 04/02/10 3:13 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
Awesome stuff :-)
IRC, will you take the lead on this?
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Feb 2010, at 20:33, "Rickard Nilsson" <rickyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have now built ScalaCheck for Scala 2.8.0 Beta 1:
http://groups.google.com/group/scalacheck/browse_thread/thread/5a1e216fa82ed91
Regards,
Rickard
Den 2010-01-31 21:57:07 skrev David Pollak
<feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>:
The problem is that there's no ScalaCheck version for Scala 2.8.0 Beta1.
The Beta1-RC5 compilation of ScalaCheck was causing the wrong Scala
libraries to be loaded.
This is seriously suboptimal.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Timothy Perrett
<timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote:
Im just doing a fresh clone and checkout to see if something was
screwed in my local build.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 31, 7:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri <indraj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was suspecting Java 1.5 (if you were on 10.5). That's not the
case. So
> I am completely stumped now.
>
> See if you can compare with the Hudson copy
>
(http://hudson.scala-tools.org/view/Lift/job/lift-framework-scala280/)
>
> - IRC
>
> On 01/02/10 12:55 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
>
>
> > macbookpro:lift-framework timperrett$ java -version
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
