Dick, that is exactly what I want also... I was expected the dude who added it to lift to tidy it up and make it more abstract before adding it to the project.
I would suggest have a base LDAP module (perhaps record based) and remove the mapper stuff. Cheers, Tim On Feb 23, 8:01 pm, Dick Hirsch <hirsch.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any chance that the LDAP functionality will be independent of > MetaMegaProtoUser and MegaProtoUser? > > Or maybe some sort of guidance (how-to?) on how to use it without > these classes. > > We've (Apache ESME) have been waiting for a while for LDAP to be > supported in Lift but we don't use MegaProtoUser. > > Thanks > > D. > > On Feb 23, 8:15 pm, Ross Mellgren <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > There's no record code in there -- it uses mapper in fact. > > > I think this is just for auth. > > > -Ross > > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I see the LDAP has finally been committed... what is it doing in > > > modules? Its a read / write to LDAP based on record... shouldn't it be > > > in persistence? > > > > Cheers, Tim > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Lift" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
