Agreed - its nice. The var's are a little unsettling though... shame there is not a way to make it more immutable.
Cheers, Tim On 24 Feb 2010, at 17:35, David Pollak wrote: > Yeah. It's good stuff. Would love to see it integrated with Mapper/Record > (so it's not looking at var fields, but looking at the more complex objects > that represent fields). > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe most of you have seen it: > > > http://max-l.github.com/Squeryl/ > > > Br's, > Marius > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
