That’s correct :)

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 15:34, Praveen Baratam <[email protected]> wrote:
Thank you for explaining @Hafeez & @Johan
Now that all the BIPs necessary for LN including SegWit (Softfork) are active 
on the mainnet, are we just waiting for the LN implementation to mature or are 
there any other issues? ᐧ
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Johan Torås Halseth < [email protected] 
[[email protected]] > wrote:
Hi,
Before you can safely broadcast the funding transaction, the two parties 
involved in a channel must have signed a commitment transaction spending the 
output from the funding transaction. Without segwit, the funding transaction 
can be malleated, leaving the commitment transaction invalid, and funds locked 
up if one of the parties stops cooperating.

Cheers, Johan
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 15:11, Hafeez Bana < [email protected] 
[[email protected]] > wrote:
to fix transaction malleability

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Praveen Baratam < [email protected] 
[[email protected]] > wrote:
Why is SegWit required for LN? If we wait for the funding transaction to be 
confirmed , we can then safely create and update unconfirmed commitment 
transactions...
I don't see how SegWit is important here... Am I missing something?

--
Dr. Praveen Baratam
about.me [http://about.me/praveen.baratam] ᐧ
______________________________ _________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
[email protected] ation.org 
[[email protected]]
https://lists.linuxfoundation. org/mailman/listinfo/lightning -dev 
[https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev]



______________________________ _________________ Lightning-dev mailing list 
Lightning-dev@lists. linuxfoundation.org 
[[email protected]] https://lists.linuxfoundation. 
org/mailman/listinfo/ lightning-dev 
[https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev]


--
Dr. Praveen Baratam
about.me [http://about.me/praveen.baratam]
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev

Reply via email to