While consistency with typical grammar might be desirable, as a made-up word, wumbo has the opportunity to define its own grammar. Do we really want to impose normal grammar on wumbo? We do not want to paint ourselves in a corner if in the future we find we need the ability to define novel grammar for made-up words.
Granted, we probably should not "roll our own grammar" without some proof of understandability. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:00 PM, Pierre <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wumbo, you wumbo, he wumbo she wumbo. > > I would respectfully disagree here: pretty sure that's "he > wumboes, she wumboes". _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
