Good morning aj, > > Trying to maximise privacy there has the disadvantage that you have to > do a new signature for every in-flight HTLC every time you update the > state, which could be a lot of signatures for very active channels.
If I remember accurately this is already true for current Poon-Dryja channels in BOLT 1.0, so at least it is not a degradation of performance. It does make this modified form of Decker-Russell-Osuntokun much less attractive for use with DLC as the Fulgurite effort would like, but the Fulgurite effort already mitigates this by splitting a channel into two sub-channels (one for high-activity LN payments, one for rare-activity DLC bets) anyway. Regards, ZmnSCPxj _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
