Rusty Russell <[email protected]> writes:
> Olaoluwa Osuntokun <[email protected]> writes:
>> Defaults don't necessarily indicate higher/lower reliability. Issuing a
>> single CLI command to raise/lower the fees on one's node doesn't magically
>> make the owner of said node a _better_ routing node operator.
>
> No, but those who put effort into their node presumably have more
> reliable nodes, and this is a signal of that.
>
> Anyone have data on channel reliability that they can correlate with
> channel fees?
Actually, since lnd sends out a disable update for nodes which are
offline for > 20 minutes, we can simply look at the current gossip:
half-channels online: 45157
percentage using 1000/1 fees: 56%
half-channels offline: 10225
percentage using 1000/1 fees: 51%
So my assumption seems completely wrong here; if there's any
correlation, it's negative.
Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Lightning-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
