Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> writes: > Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laol...@gmail.com> writes: >> Defaults don't necessarily indicate higher/lower reliability. Issuing a >> single CLI command to raise/lower the fees on one's node doesn't magically >> make the owner of said node a _better_ routing node operator. > > No, but those who put effort into their node presumably have more > reliable nodes, and this is a signal of that. > > Anyone have data on channel reliability that they can correlate with > channel fees?
Actually, since lnd sends out a disable update for nodes which are offline for > 20 minutes, we can simply look at the current gossip: half-channels online: 45157 percentage using 1000/1 fees: 56% half-channels offline: 10225 percentage using 1000/1 fees: 51% So my assumption seems completely wrong here; if there's any correlation, it's negative. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev