Good morning Rusty, Looks OK to me.
Regards, ZmnSCPxj > It was pointed out to me[1] at thelightningconference.com that it's often > a legal requirement to list the vendor on a receipt. It also makes > perfect sense. > > It can be done in the description field, but that's really supposed to > be a description of the items. Dividing it also lets wallets have > much better UX. > > The spec change itself is genuinely trivial: > > - `v` (12): `data_length` variable. Optional name of vendor/supplier > (UTF-8). > > Feedback from wallets and vendors appreciatedg! > Rusty. > PS. Pull req at > https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/694, > but I realize that can be intimidating, hence this mail. > > [1] I'd like to credit this properly, but I was jetlagged and having way > too much fun. Please claim if this was your idea :) > > > Lightning-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
