Comment #13 on issue 2496 by [email protected]: Patch: 30 day webathon for
kickstarter support
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2496
"has had several LGTMs" is only accurate if you count Patchy the autobot
in, and
a) those don't accumulate but merely report the status of the last patch.
b) more LGTM from Patchy mean either redundant runs or a patch that needed
several iterations.
Now it is true that there was _one_ LGTM in the course of the discussion
from Graham (though not on the last iteration of he patch) and the caveat
of that LGTM has been addressed.
Maybe we should change the text from the accept-patch command and reserve
LGTM to humans rather than an automated review using a human only as
compoment? Before I recognized it as an autogenerated text, I tended to
assign more meaning to it than appropropriate as well.
