Comment #5 on issue 3201 by [email protected]: Patch: Don't initialize dim_cache_ array via constructor syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3201

This is a real barf bag.  While
    dim_cache_ [a] = Dimension_cache (s.dim_cache_ [a]);
now calls the copy constructor for creating separate copies of the members (pointers) of s.dim_cache, the temporary created by the call to Dimension_cache is destructed afterwards, taking those copies along with it. So again, double destruction. Quite insane semantics of Dimension_cache, and I should be surprised if they never lead to trouble.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Reply via email to