urw-base35-fonts in Fedora 27 now includes OpenType fonts so no more warning
when running configure:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
This is the review request for including extractpdfmark in Fedora. Still open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
---
** [issues:#4998] Doc: CG - update information for compiling LP with regard to
new URW++ fonts**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Wed Nov 16, 2016 03:44 PM UTC by pkx166h
**Last Updated:** Fri Nov 10, 2017 04:49 PM UTC
**Owner:** Federico Bruni
This came out of issue 4991.
We need to update the CG to include information about the URW++ fonts that are
now possible to use when compiling LP snippets and where configure will post a
warning for those users that do not have these fonts installed.
Currently the fonts we need are a tiny subset of a much larger font
family(families?) so instructions to install just these few fonts as described
in https://codereview.appspot.com/315850043/ is, at the moment, not so simple.
There is a discussion about either documenting how to 'wget' the specific
commits from the URW++ git repo or perhaps tar the files up so developers can
download them from the LP website. That is still TBD.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
