"Jonas Hahnfeld" <hah...@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> As far as I know, James only applies the patch but does not produce a
> commit, hence the gittxt is correct.
>
> The differences look ok to me, the profiling results have always been
> a bit odd on my system. Fortunately we can now fix this correctly by
> sorting the snippet names before compiling them, see
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5721/.
If you take a look how LilyPond distributes jobs on the command line to
different LilyPond processes, it should be clear that basically any
addition or removal of a regtest causes a quite different distribution
of of snippets across processes.
--
David Kastrup
---
** [issues:#4943] Manual page breaking causing assertion failure**
**Status:** Started
**Created:** Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:51 AM UTC by pkx166h
**Last Updated:** Sat Feb 01, 2020 12:29 PM UTC
**Owner:** Thomas Morley
**Attachments:**
-
[AssertionFailing.ly](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4943/attachment/AssertionFailing.ly)
(1.1 kB; text/x-lilypond)
Thomas Morley - 46 minutes ago
Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries
Issue 4943
As Issue 4943 on Windows compilation was triggered by
missing _FPU_SETCW() in the MINGW libraries, an alternate call to
initiate the X87 FPU setup as an inline-assembler command is added
- for MINGW 32 Bit compilation only.
https://codereview.appspot.com/575600043/
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 at 09:55 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, it turns out this was easy to minimise the code. File is attached.
> It's still ~70 bars but only one voice, which is the dynamics staff of a
> piano score (without anything else), so it's only silent music.
>
> "AutoPageBreaksOff" in the score block causes the exception failure.
>
> I note some "insane spring distance" warnings.These don't happen in the
> real thing.
>
> Chris
Note: According to Phil H's own tests: "This started in 2.19.21. 2.19.20 is
OK."
Update: an instance of this affects also non-Windows systems, see
[comment](#b3ae) below.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto