- Description has changed:
Diff:
~~~~
--- old
+++ new
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+https://codereview.appspot.com/559700043
+
Noeck wrote :
is this a bug or done on purpose? The following snippet produces beams
of which the lowest beam does not touch the staff line below.
~~~~
- **Needs**: -->
- **Type**: -->
---
** [issues:#5036] 128 beaming output not producing output as expected (?)**
**Status:** Started
**Created:** Fri Jan 20, 2017 01:43 PM UTC by Palmer Ralph
**Last Updated:** Tue Mar 24, 2020 06:15 PM UTC
**Owner:** Torsten Hämmerle
https://codereview.appspot.com/559700043
Noeck wrote :
is this a bug or done on purpose? The following snippet produces beams
of which the lowest beam does not touch the staff line below.
~~~~
{ g128[ g] }
~~~~
The small-gaps-fill-with-ink theory should avoid this. IMHO the output
would look better like this:
~~~~
{
\override Beam.positions = #'(2.7 . 2.7)
g128[ g]
}
~~~~
What do the experts think?
This has been discussed at some length on the user list.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list._______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
