Patch formatted against current master attached.
Please push it for me.
Thanks,
Torsten
Attachments:
-
[0001-Issue-5036-128-beaming-output-not-producing-output-a.patch](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/_discuss/thread/1a78231c/330f/a2c7/attachment/0001-Issue-5036-128-beaming-output-not-producing-output-a.patch)
(6.3 kB; text/x-patch)
---
** [issues:#5036] 128 beaming output not producing output as expected (?)**
**Status:** Started
**Created:** Fri Jan 20, 2017 01:43 PM UTC by Palmer Ralph
**Last Updated:** Sun Mar 29, 2020 12:25 PM UTC
**Owner:** Torsten Hämmerle
https://codereview.appspot.com/559700043
Noeck wrote :
is this a bug or done on purpose? The following snippet produces beams
of which the lowest beam does not touch the staff line below.
~~~~
{ g128[ g] }
~~~~
The small-gaps-fill-with-ink theory should avoid this. IMHO the output
would look better like this:
~~~~
{
\override Beam.positions = #'(2.7 . 2.7)
g128[ g]
}
~~~~
What do the experts think?
This has been discussed at some length on the user list.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list._______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
