CVSROOT: /cvsroot/lilypond
Module name: lilypond
Branch:
Changes by: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/08/18 03:58:00
Modified files:
Documentation/user: putting.itely
Log message:
Guess what's changing again? :)
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely.diff?tr1=1.7&tr2=1.8&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely
diff -u lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely:1.7
lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely:1.8
--- lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely:1.7 Wed Aug 17 09:57:08 2005
+++ lilypond/Documentation/user/putting.itely Thu Aug 18 03:58:00 2005
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@
@end lilypond
That looks better, but it isn't quite big enough. After experimenting
-with a few values, I think 2.3 is the best number in this case. However,
+with a few values, we think 2.3 is the best number in this case. However,
this number is merely the result of experimentation and my personal
taste in notation. Try the above example with 2.3... but also try higher
(and lower) numbers. Which do you think looks the best?
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
With @code{extra-offset}, the first number controls the horizontal
movement (left is negative); the second number controls the vertial
-movement (up is positive). After a bit of experimenting, I decided
+movement (up is positive). After a bit of experimenting, we decided
that these values look good
@lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2]
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-cvs
