[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ok, I am not that C++ guru. This method should actually be something that
> in e.g. Java would be called an abstract method: Ligature_engraver just
> defines the interface of this method, but leaves the implementation to its
> subclasses (but it must be declared in Ligature_engraver itself, since it
> is virtually envoked from the process_music() code of Ligature_engraver).
ok, then
Ligature_engraver::create_ligature_spanner () { return 0 ; }
also does the trick.
> > If the engraver doesn't create anything (which is not the case, it
> > seems), then the /*creats */ entry should simply be empty.
>
> Most probably. But if I recall correctly, there was some problem with
> acknowledge_grob() not being called in some cases. Hence, when putting
> the creats entry empty, one should double check that
>
>
>http://lilypond.org/development/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/White-mensural-ligatures.html#White%20mensural%20ligatures
>
> still shows ligatures (as the website of 1.7.8 currently does, while in
> 1.7.6, ligatures did not show).
If something like this happens, I propose that we first find out what
causes it, and only then fix it.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
