Han-Wen, On 3/15/2004 12:20 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >>>necessary? If not, then we can skip that option, and simply never >>>merge if styles are different. >> >>I considered that, but I saw the pattern for different heads and >>different dottings. Not having much choral experience (where I >>suspect this comes into play), I don't see a lot of reason for those >>properties, either, but lilypond provides them. So I figured I'd >>also provide a mechanism for the existing behavior as part of my >>fix. I was just trying to leave as much flexibility in > > > The other properties reflect some guitar and piano practices. I don't > see use of a merge-different-style, so please leave it out for now. We > can always put it back in later. >
No problem. Thanks for the feedback. > >>function, and used it for my patch, too. >> >>I have been playing around the last couple of weeks with the autochange function >>(also for use with handbells - expect a patch in a couple of days), and I've >>been learning quite a bit about object and context properties. I now would use >>the property directly, but I didn't realize how it all fit together when I wrote >>this patch. > > > I haven't integrated your previous patch due to the questions I > had. Could you (re)implement the functionality as you would do it now, > and send me the patch, so I can apply it to the CVS repo? Thanks! > > I should be able to do it tonight. I'll get it to you as soon as it's done. Doug _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
