[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion. > > > > Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw, > > the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing > > something? > > Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages are obvious: > Exact generation of the music glyphs, no need for mftrace. > Additionally, the conversion will be around 10times faster. We still > need fontforge for removing overlaps[1] and adding hints, though.
Ok - you would do me favor if you could first write the glue for texstrings. We're in a rather painful transition from our font-subsystem to using pango right now, and things would be easier if we could just dump our old infrastructure, by integrating TeX-metrics. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
