[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Thursday 14 April 2005 21.31, Stephen wrote: ... > > In the example, '\set Score.currentBarNumber = #1' creates the problem. I
Correct. > > don't see why the numbering is reset there other than to remove the number > > from that bar because it collides with the mark "D". There must be another > > way to suppress the bar number at that bar. > > It also changes the numbering of all subsequent bars. I don't know the > author's intent in this case (I didn't write that snippet), but I guess it > could be something like an attaca movement. Yes. The bigger picture is H. Purcells opera "Dido & Æneas": http://aspodata.se/motett/noter/act* I did not like idea of big bar number, like 543. I think it is better with aria/movement 23, bar 25. > > > However, I fixed it by setting the accidental style to 'forget'. See? there > > is already a way to do it. *No*, the forget does not work for: act 1, aria 13, bar 6 Violin II: the b is shown with natural act 1, aria 13, bar 11 Violin I: the f is shown with natural Elsewhere yes, but not for theese two notes. I don't know how to solv theese. If I put another f before bar 11 for V1, that f gets the natural. It seems that the first f, in this case, gets the natural, and I tried to insert a \hideNote f \unHideNote, but it was still visible. Btw, I solved the issue for the other places by starting each aria like: \set Score.explicitKeySignatureVisibility = #begin-of-line-visible \set Score.printKeyCancellation = ##f \key c \minor when the previous part already was in c minor. It would be nice if I could write: \key c \minor \music02 \key c \minor \music03 \key c \minor \music04 \key c \minor \music05 and the key-engraver only shows the key signature when it *changes*. I tried hack around in lily/key-engraver.cc and doing things like if (scm_is_eq (last, key)) return, found no solution. ... > > Erik > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:53 PM > > Subject: removing unwanted accidentals > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > There seems to be a need for a way to notate that a single note should > > > _not_ > > > have an accidental displayed, something like a 'force-no-accidental' > > > property. Possible, but for this case I would prefer: 1, fixing the bug 2, make key-engraver only show changes The reason for 2, is that I prefer to put the workaround in one place, instead of littering down the .ly with bug-corrections, that must be refound when the bug is removed. > > > > > > I think there was a discussion about this over a year ago, without a > > > conclusion. Now there have been 2 or 3 (implicit) requests for it in a > > > short > > > time, and IMHO it's a reasonable feature. > > > > > > Also it looks pretty trivial to implement; may I give it a try? > > > > > > Erik > > > > > > On Sunday 10 April 2005 14.32, Karl Hammar wrote: > > >> How do I remove the unwanted explicit flats in the next to last > > >> measure in: > > >> > > >> \version "2.4.2" > > >> > > >> \relative c'' { > > >> \override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible > > >> \mark #03 > > >> \clef treble > > >> \key c \minor > > >> a2 b | > > >> d1 | > > >> \mark #04 > > >> \set Score.currentBarNumber = #1 > > >> d2 es8. as,16 bes8 c | > > >> % ^ ^ unwanted explicit flats here > > >> d1 > > >> } > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel