I can't think of a situation where anyone except a beginner who didn't
understand the philosopy behind lllypond would want to use a
"no-accidental" style. OTOH it is useful to have workarounds for bugs.
\noAccidental seems ideal for this. It is not as cumbersome as having to
change the accidental-style for a single not but is awkward enough (in a
way that something like \& is not) to prompt the user to seek an
alternative. The documentation for it could say something like:
"If you find yourself using \noAccidental frequently the the chances are
that you are either using the wrong accidental style or have found a bug
in LilyPond."
> You could do that like
> {cis1~\break #(set-accidental-style 'no-forget) cis2 #(set-accidental-style
> 'default) }
> but IMHO this would be more logical, & easier to read and write:
> {cis1~\break cis2\noAccidental}
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
--
Bernard Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
