In that case it's better to implement an additional command
like \lilypondmusicglyph{scripts.turn} that lilypond-book
will recognize and replace with the appropriate TeX code
(hmm, what should be done for the HTML mode?).
This looks like a project beyond 2.6.

   /Mats

Graham Percival wrote:

On 20-May-05, at 5:24 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

See the comment I added in the manual for lilypond-book.


What were we saying about bug reports and feature requests in
the comments of the manual?  :)

Comment removed from lilypond-book.itely:
** AARGH. the titledefs and feta20.tex files will not be found
  now that the lilypond-profile isn't used anymore!!!  /Mats


If users input the location of feta20.tex manually, could it still work? ie

\documentclass...
\include{/path/to/feta20.tex}


Actually, what about doing it at compile time? When we're compiling lilypond-book.py, lilypond knows where feta20.tex is, right? So we could write that value into the compiled lilypond-book, and when lilypond-book does the .lytex -> .tex conversion, we could add the required \include, \usepackage, \input, or whatever it needs. Just like the \usepackage{graphicx}

Cheers,
- Graham


-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================


_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to