Citerar Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Are we going to add this before 2.6.0? If not, please let me know now.
> > I can
> > fix the docs (template and manual) to reflect this. I think the optimal
> > solution
> > would be to add \usepackage{graphic-whatever} line automatically with
> > lilypond-book, but if that's not going to happen I need to update the docs
> > accordingly.
>
> See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-05/msg00042.html
> for an even more optimal suggestion :-)
> I'm still a bit too busy with other things to look into it, but it
> should be easy to just search for \begin{document} to know where to
> insert the extra line.
Would it make sense to add a lilypond-book option for not adding any graphicx
line? That might be useful for those who prefer more bizarre graphics packages,
and it would be a good workaround for bugs in lily-book's graphicx adding code.
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
