Brynne and Russ Jorgensen writes: >> Caller (eg, lilypad.scm) can then decide what to do. Does this work >> for you? >> > > I don't have a strong opinion either way, so if you think it's better > to keep two executables, I'm definitely supportive.
This is now all post-2.6, but it would be nice to know if it works. > Remember that > lilypad can be executed directly from the windows explorer, so you'll > need a front-end other than lilypad.scm to choose at runtime which > version to use. Why do you think that? Isn't lilypond-invoke-editor.scm run that way too? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
